This is a story about Rush Limbaugh that is not about Rush Limbaugh.
The story is about the dangers of relying on the internet (including this column) as a source of information about anything. Before you venture into this web of deception, you’d better be armed with a well-maintained bullshit detector, a.k.a. an informed, rational, and fully-functional brain.

Good NFL Role Model
Rush and some of his buddies are talking about buying the NFL St. Louis Rams. Apparently there are people out there, including a lot of sportswriters, who don’t like Rush. They think he would be bad for the game unlike, say, Al Davis, Michael Vick, Lyle Alzado, or that paragon of role models, O.J. Simpson.
So, these “journalists” crank up Google and do some in-depth research to prove Limbaugh is a racist, unfit to be an NFL owner.
And they all come up with the same pieces of “evidence:”
“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray (Dr. King’s assassin). We miss you, James. Godspeed.”
“Let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back. I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”
Limbaugh allegedly made both statements on his nationally syndicated radio broadcast. These two quotes are all over the internet and, worse still, have made it into print across the country. Did Limbaugh really say these things? On the radio?
Of course not.

Bad NFL Role Model
I rarely listen to Limbaugh so, if he’d actually said these things, I would not have heard them. Yet I am certain the above two quotes are lies. How do I know? Because I’m armed with a well-maintained bullshit detector that, believe me, gets plenty of exercise every day.
Both quotes come from Jack Huberman’s book, 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America.
Bullshit alert #1. Something about the title of Huberman’s book tells me he has an agenda.
Bullshit alert #2. Huberman’s publisher, Nation Books (The Nation Institute) also has an agenda. You can look Nation Books up for yourself and decide what their agenda is.
Bullshit alert #3. Huberman never provides a source for these quotes other than to say they aired on Limbaugh’s national radio program sometime in 1998.
Bullshit alert #4. Millions of people listen to Limbaugh every day. Many thousands record his program. Not everyone who listens to Limbaugh is a fan. If he’d actually said these things in 1998 he’d no longer be on the radio. There’s not a station in the country that would touch a commentator who had made such tasteless and overtly racist comments.
Bullshit alert #5. Limbaugh made the alleged comments in 1998 but they were not published until 2006. Why did such inflammatory stuff, if true, languish for eight years?
Bullshit alert #6. Even after the publication of Huberman’s book no one, except the very naïve, gave it any credibility. Where were the demonstrations, the boycotts, the congressional hearings, the lynch mobs?
Now, someone somewhere unearths these undocumented quotes and posts them to the internet. In less than 24 hours a Google search on one of the quotes jumped from 6 hits to 8,080. Read most of the references that cite these quotes and you’d think Limbaugh was a direct descendant of Simon Legree.
But enough about Rush, Jack Huberman, and a raft of gullible sportswriters.
The real danger here is to your children. Huh? Well, ever since Al Gore invented the internet there’s been a push to “wire” our schools, to get our kids “connected.” Connected to what? Basically, electronic versions of The National Enquirer, People, Us, and The Weekly World News. And, of course, Jack Huberman.

Vanishing Role Model
Do your kids really need the internet as an information source? What do they gain by having ready access to millions of uncatalogued, undocumented “facts?” Next parent-teacher conference, instead of oohing and aahing over the new computers, “interactive learning modules,” and high-speed internet access, ask the teacher, “What are you doing to teach my child the critical thinking skills he needs to make sense of all this?” “What are you doing to teach him how to express himself clearly, orally and in writing?” “What are you doing to teach him the analytical skills he needs to understand the deluge of numbers we see every day?”
In short, “Are you teaching him to think?”
Papal Poaching
October 23, 2009Pope Benedict XVI (aka Joseph Ratzinger) understands the business of religion at least as well as he understands theology. He knows that the Church survives on two things: money and members. Bring in lots of money along with lots of people and the business of religion moves forward (or backward, depending on your point of view).
It Must Be Big Hat Day at Wrigley Field
But in the US, the Catholic Church is losing ground. Attendance is down, money is drying up, and the shortage of priests is critical. Church after church is closing; the American middle class is abandoning the Church in droves. For older Catholics, the Church has lost its tradition, mysticism, and authority. For younger Catholics, it is irrelevant. The sex scandals, pederasty, and ensuing publicity have cost the Church dearly in both prestige and treasure.
But Pope Ratzinger surveys the bleak American landscape and sees opportunity. There’s business to be done here and Ratzinger has told the Church’s Marketing Department to focus on America.
For sheer numbers of members, there are Spanish-speaking Americans: Hispanics, Mexicans, Latinos, Nuyoricans—whatever you choose to call them. They may not have the big bucks but their birth and immigration rates are enough to bring a smile to the face of the most cynical archbishop. No coitus interruptus, condoms, or abortions here. These are birth rates that would make the Irish blush. And most of these people come from nominal Catholic backgrounds. It won’t take much to recruit them.
And the money? Look no further than the Church of England, the Anglican Communion, the Episcopalians. The Pope and his minions are actively poaching disgruntled clergy and communicants of the Anglican church. Rome knows many Episcopalians are sick of the ‘social gospel,’ gay bishops, same-sex marriages, watered-down dogma, and the ordination of women. They yearn for the good old days of the authoritarian, misogynistic church—“old time religion” without the shitty music. And the Episcopalians have got money. Fill the pews with Hispanics and the coffers with old Episcopal money. Mirabile dictu.
Now, mind you, the Episcopalians and the Hispanics won’t be sitting in the same churches (at least not at the same time of day). That would be stretching the ecumenical movement too far even for this captain of Religion, Inc. But separate services, like the ones at Holy Trinity in St. Ann MO are bringing the bodies and the money. (Rule 3A: Any event intended for English-speaking ex-Episcopalians must end in time for the first serving of Sunday brunch at the Briarwood).
All of this is win-win for the Pope:
And the Episcopalians win, too. They finally get rid of all those conservatives who have stood in the way of progressivism and social relevance in the modern Anglican Communion. It’s hard to ordain a female bishop or consecrate a gay marriage when the folks in the back rows are hollering, “You’re all going to hell and good riddance!”
And another big win for His Holiness: he gets to save all these Anglicans and Hispanics from the everlasting fires of Hell. Don’t forget that, despite the power of its billion members and trillion-dollar budget, the Catholic Church really believes the shit they preach. In 2000, when that old sweetheart John Paul was still running things at the Vatican, the Church issued “Dominus Iesus,” a formal document claiming the Catholic Church was the only sure path to salvation. The rest of the world (or at least those who still believe in an afterlife) bristled but, of course, Muslims, Baptists, Buddhists and other assorted heretics have been hearing this shit from the One True Church for centuries.
BTW, guess who wrote “Dominus Iesus?” That’s right, none other than Joe Ratzinger. At the time he was the head guy over at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Think of Ratzinger as sort of the Pope’s consigliere, in charge of rooting out heresies and heretics wherever they might lurk within the Church. You know, keeping the Don posted on who could be trusted and who needed watching.
The sinister import of Ratzinger’s pre-Papal duties might be more apparent if you knew that prior to 1908 (when the Vatican’s PR department got a clue), Ratzinger’s job title would have been:
Precept of the Supreme Sacred Congregation
of the Roman and Universal Inquisition