Papal Poaching

October 23, 2009

Pope Benedict XVI (aka Joseph Ratzinger) understands the business of religion at least as well as he understands theology. He knows that the Church survives on two things: money and members. Bring in lots of money along with lots of people and the business of religion moves forward (or backward, depending on your point of view).

big hat day

It Must Be Big Hat Day at Wrigley Field

But in the US, the Catholic Church is losing ground. Attendance is down, money is drying up, and the shortage of priests is critical. Church after church is closing; the American middle class is abandoning the Church in droves. For older Catholics, the Church has lost its tradition, mysticism, and authority. For younger Catholics, it is irrelevant. The sex scandals, pederasty, and ensuing publicity have cost the Church dearly in both prestige and treasure.

But Pope Ratzinger surveys the bleak American landscape and sees opportunity. There’s business to be done here and Ratzinger has told the Church’s Marketing Department to focus on America.

For sheer numbers of members, there are Spanish-speaking Americans: Hispanics, Mexicans, Latinos, Nuyoricans—whatever you choose to call them. They may not have the big bucks but their birth and immigration rates are enough to bring a smile to the face of the most cynical archbishop. No coitus interruptus, condoms, or abortions here. These are birth rates that would make the Irish blush. And most of these people come from nominal Catholic backgrounds. It won’t take much to recruit them.

And the money? Look no further than the Church of England, the Anglican Communion, the Episcopalians. The Pope and his minions are actively poaching disgruntled clergy and communicants of the Anglican church. Rome knows many Episcopalians are sick of the ‘social gospel,’ gay bishops, same-sex marriages, watered-down dogma, and the ordination of women. They yearn for the good old days of the authoritarian, misogynistic church—“old time religion” without the shitty music. And the Episcopalians have got money. Fill the pews with Hispanics and the coffers with old Episcopal money. Mirabile dictu.

Now, mind you, the Episcopalians and the Hispanics won’t be sitting in the same churches (at least not at the same time of day). That would be stretching the ecumenical movement too far even for this captain of Religion, Inc. But separate services, like the ones at Holy Trinity in St. Ann MO are bringing the bodies and the money. (Rule 3A: Any event intended for English-speaking ex-Episcopalians must end in time for the first serving of Sunday brunch at the Briarwood).

All of this is win-win for the Pope:

  • From the Latinos, he gets the membership numbers he needs to keep the American Catholic Church relevant in the 21st century.
  • From the Episcopalians, he gets the money. After all, money is the mother’s milk of the Church, just as it is in politics. (Sometime, while you’re sitting at a traffic light or otherwise casually occupied, ask yourself this question: If God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, etc,. etc., why does he need your money? Shouldn’t he be at least as capable as Obama—able to conjure up trillions at the snap of a finger?)

And the Episcopalians win, too. They finally get rid of all those conservatives who have stood in the way of progressivism and social relevance in the modern Anglican Communion. It’s hard to ordain a female bishop or consecrate a gay marriage when the folks in the back rows are hollering, “You’re all going to hell and good riddance!”

And another big win for His Holiness: he gets to save all these Anglicans and Hispanics from the everlasting fires of Hell. Don’t forget that, despite the power of its billion members and trillion-dollar budget, the Catholic Church really believes the shit they preach. In 2000, when that old sweetheart John Paul was still running things at the Vatican, the Church issued “Dominus Iesus,” a formal document claiming the Catholic Church was the only sure path to salvation. The rest of the world (or at least those who still believe in an afterlife) bristled but, of course, Muslims, Baptists, Buddhists and other assorted heretics have been hearing this shit from the One True Church for centuries.

BTW, guess who wrote “Dominus Iesus?” That’s right, none other than Joe Ratzinger. At the time he was the head guy over at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Think of Ratzinger as sort of the Pope’s consigliere, in charge of rooting out heresies and heretics wherever they might lurk within the Church. You know, keeping the Don posted on who could be trusted and who needed watching.

The sinister import of Ratzinger’s pre-Papal duties might be more apparent if you knew that prior to 1908 (when the Vatican’s PR department got a clue), Ratzinger’s job title would have been:

Precept of the Supreme Sacred Congregation
of the Roman and Universal Inquisition


Obama & Co. Get It Right

October 21, 2009

According to the Associated Press, “federal prosecutors are being told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana…” Really? After half a century of Puritanical enforcement of laws against marijuana the Feds have finally figured it out: a) yes, marijuana does have legitimate medical uses, and; b) even if it didn’t, who cares?

Apparently the Neanderthals in the Justice Department who saw Reefer Madness in high school are finally dying off. Federal prosecutors in the 14 states that permit medical use of marijuana have received a memo from the Justice Department telling them to lay off. Copies of the memo also went to top officials in the DEA and FBI

The only downside to all this is that Feds and cops in the 14 states will now have to buy (or grow) their pot like everyone else instead of stealing it from the people they arrest.

Need some relief from a “medical problem?” Try Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, or Washington. (Exercise caution in Maryland. Somehow they’ve decided that medical use of marijuana is still a crime, but the penalties are reduced. Already, in West Baltimore, several marijuana users walked with just brief probation after pleading successfully that they were only smoking ‘to mend a broken heart.’)


It’s Time to Declare Victory and Go Home

October 20, 2009

“The obstacle we face is America.” So said a mullah at a demonstration in Peshawar this past summer. Things would be fine, he says, if the Americans would just go away.

He’s probably wrong, but so what. Let’s take him at his word. It’s time for America to declare victory and go home. Let’s pull our money and, far more important, our young men and women out of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and any other place where we’re apparently not welcome.

What will happen? On the up side, we’ll save American lives and a ton of money. Downside? A lot of people are going to die. But they seem bent on killing each other whether we’re there or not. We’re just getting in the way.

Let the beheadings, rapes, infanticide, torture, kidnappings, thievery, butchery, bribery, corruption, killings, and general mayhem begin. It’s time for the Great Satan to head home, crack open a beer, tilt back in the Barcalounger, and watch the slaughter on CNN.

vjday

VJ Day - August 11, 1945 - America's Last Military Victory


Crazy Like a Fox

October 20, 2009

foxYou’ve probably heard the White House is telling everyone, including other media outlets, to disregard Fox News. According to the White House, Fox is biased.

The White House, as usual, is correct; Fox is biased, as is every other news organization in the country. The problem is that Fox is not biased in the proper way like, say, those perpetual lap-dogs of the left, CNN and NPR.

Nixon’s most serious tactic during Watergate is now obvious. He should have told everyone, “Pay no attention to the Washington Post.”

Wow, if Fox had been around during the Nixon era, I’ll bet they could have saved his presidency.


Rush to Judgment

October 15, 2009

This is a story about Rush Limbaugh that is not about Rush Limbaugh.

The story is about the dangers of relying on the internet (including this column) as a source of information about anything. Before you venture into this web of deception, you’d better be armed with a well-maintained bullshit detector, a.k.a. an informed, rational, and fully-functional brain.

simpson

Good NFL Role Model

Rush and some of his buddies are talking about buying the NFL St. Louis Rams. Apparently there are people out there, including a lot of sportswriters, who don’t like Rush. They think he would be bad for the game unlike, say, Al Davis, Michael Vick, Lyle Alzado, or that paragon of role models, O.J. Simpson.

So, these “journalists” crank up Google and do some in-depth research to prove Limbaugh is a racist, unfit to be an NFL owner.

And they all come up with the same pieces of “evidence:”

“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray (Dr. King’s assassin). We miss you, James. Godspeed.”

“Let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back. I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”

Limbaugh allegedly made both statements on his nationally syndicated radio broadcast. These two quotes are all over the internet and, worse still, have made it into print across the country. Did Limbaugh really say these things? On the radio?

Of course not.

limbaugh

Bad NFL Role Model

I rarely listen to Limbaugh so, if he’d actually said these things, I would not have heard them. Yet I am certain the above two quotes are lies. How do I know? Because I’m armed with a well-maintained bullshit detector that, believe me, gets plenty of exercise every day.

Both quotes come from Jack Huberman’s book, 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America.

Bullshit alert #1. Something about the title of Huberman’s book tells me he has an agenda.

Bullshit alert #2. Huberman’s publisher, Nation Books (The Nation Institute) also has an agenda. You can look Nation Books up for yourself and decide what their agenda is.

Bullshit alert #3. Huberman never provides a source for these quotes other than to say they aired on Limbaugh’s national radio program sometime in 1998.

Bullshit alert #4. Millions of people listen to Limbaugh every day. Many thousands record his program. Not everyone who listens to Limbaugh is a fan. If he’d actually said these things in 1998 he’d no longer be on the radio. There’s not a station in the country that would touch a commentator who had made such tasteless and overtly racist comments.

Bullshit alert #5. Limbaugh made the alleged comments in 1998 but they were not published until 2006. Why did such inflammatory stuff, if true, languish for eight years?

Bullshit alert #6. Even after the publication of Huberman’s book no one, except the very naïve, gave it any credibility. Where were the demonstrations, the boycotts, the congressional hearings, the lynch mobs?

Now, someone somewhere unearths these undocumented quotes and posts them to the internet. In less than 24 hours a Google search on one of the quotes jumped from 6 hits to 8,080. Read most of the references that cite these quotes and you’d think Limbaugh was a direct descendant of Simon Legree.

But enough about Rush, Jack Huberman, and a raft of gullible sportswriters.

The real danger here is to your children. Huh? Well, ever since Al Gore invented the internet there’s been a push to “wire” our schools, to get our kids “connected.” Connected to what? Basically, electronic versions of The National Enquirer, People, Us, and The Weekly World News. And, of course, Jack Huberman.

classroom

Vanishing Role Model

Do your kids really need the internet as an information source? What do they gain by having ready access to millions of uncatalogued, undocumented “facts?” Next parent-teacher conference, instead of oohing and aahing over the new computers, “interactive learning modules,” and high-speed internet access, ask the teacher, “What are you doing to teach my child the critical thinking skills he needs to make sense of all this?” “What are you doing to teach him how to express himself clearly, orally and in writing?” “What are you doing to teach him the analytical skills he needs to understand the deluge of numbers we see every day?”

In short, “Are you teaching him to think?”


Nobody’s Safe When Mikey Gets Angry

October 10, 2009

Well-known Hollywood asshole, Michael Moore, was in Washington last week to promote his new movie Capitalism: A Love Story. Caution, plot spoiler ahead: The title is a ruse; Michael really hates capitalism.

Anyway, while in town Mr. Moore took the opportunity to lecture congressmen who were hindering the passage of a bill that would affect the health care of virtually every American except congressmen (and, perhaps, Hollywood assholes).

Mr. Moore was generous with his threats:

“I and a lot of other people have every intention of removing you from Congress in the next election if you stand in the way of health-care legislation that the people want. We will come to your districts, and we will work against you. You think we’re going to go along with you…? You should think again!”

mooreWow, if I were a Republican, I’d be shitting my drawers. I mean, the Republicans got creamed in the last election. Their future looks even bleaker. This time Mr. Moore and his coterie of guilt-ridden millionaires have declared all-out district-by-district guerilla warfare on every Republican candidate. This could be a bloodbath of Cambodian proportions.

What’s that you say? I misquoted Mr. Moore? Well, I did shorten the quotation somewhat; Mikey tends to be rather long winded. Let’s look at that Moore quote again: “You think we’re going to go along with you just because you’re Democrats? You should think again!”

WTF? Led by Mr. Moore, the Hollywood crowd are going after Democrats for failing to pass “…health-care legislation that the people want.” Mikey, did it occur to you that maybe the Democrats are backing away from this health-care boondoggle almost as fast as the Republicans because they’ve figured out that the people don’t want it?

Last we looked, Bubble Boy, only 36% of the people thought the health care plan was a good idea. We’re betting that, like you, most of them have IQ’s below 90.

Better order another pizza before they enact that ‘fat tax.’


If Wishes Were Horses, Beggars Would Ride

October 9, 2009

I know a lot of you worry about the decline of America over the past few years—that our citizens appear to be getting more fatuous by the day. You’re probably right—some of your neighbors already are dumber than a box of rocks.

courage

Courage

But Friday’s news that Barak Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize is proof that much of the world, or at least the Europeans who dominate the Nobel Committee, are as just stupid as we Americans. They’ve awarded this prestigious prize to Obama for what?—the same things for which he was elected here: unrealistic and unrealized promises.

Here’s the justification for Mr. Obama’s Peace Prize:

  • promising to close the Guantanamo Bay facility
  • promising to achieve Middle East peace
  • promising to end the war in Iraq
  • promising to defeat al Qaeda
  • promising to halt Iran’s nuclear weapons program
  • promising to convince North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons
  • offering the world hope
  • striving for nuclear disarmament
  • extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples
  • working to restart stalled Middle East peace moves
  • capturing the world’s attention and giving its people hope for a better future
  • being seen around the world as an inspirational figure
  • creating a new climate in international politics
  • having a vision of world without nuclear weapons
  • emphasizing the role of the United Nations and other international forums
  • negotiating with Russia to cut armaments

Not one of these promises or visions has been realized. All are based solely on “Hope” a word fast becoming synonymous with “Bullshit.”

Fortunately, Mr. Obama did not con the entire world. Arabs and other residents of the Asian subcontinent were not fooled:

Pakistani Islamic party leader Liaqat Baluch called the award an “embarrassing joke.”

Taliban flack Zabihullah Mujahid said it was absurd to give a peace award to a man who had just sent 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan. (And, as this is written, Obama is considering sending another 40,000 Americans to Afghanistan). Maybe that’s why they gave Obama the Peace Prize—to compromise him. How can a guy who gets the Nobel Peace Prize in the morning commit another four divisions to a war in the afternoon?

Even the Arab man in the street is not fooled: Baghdad laborer Issam al-Khazraji said “the man of ‘change’ hasn’t changed anything yet.”

But let’s give Mr. Obama his due. Winning the Nobel Prize is a singular accomplishment, associating Mr. Obama with rare company, indeed. After all, Yassar Arafat won the Peace Prize in 1994.


You’re Afraid and Stupid

October 8, 2009

Do you have misgivings about the Obama administration’s proposed health care “reforms?” If so, it’s only because you’re afraid and stupid. This is according to a story recently posted by CNN, Fears Fuel Emotional Health Care Protests.

In the story CNN characterizes the responses of health care reform opponents asafraid “emotional.” Here’s how the mental state of health care reform opponents is described:

  • “…citizens… are afraid…”
  • “…there’s an underlying fear here…”
  • “Obama tried to alleviate fears…”
  • “I think that’s the fear…”
  • “…he’s not been really able to allay that fear…”
  • “Critics are voicing fears…”

So, as far as CNN is concerned, if you object to Obama’s reforms it can’t be the result of rational doubt or intelligent inquiry; your response is emotional and must be driven by fear.

And, CNN’s crack analysts have already figured out why health care reform opponents are afraid: It’s because they’re stupid. What?? CNN is calling health care opponents stupid? Not exactly. Instead, they use the politically correct term “misinformed.” That’s right, folks. CNN says the reason you’re opposed to health care reform is because you’re misinformed [i.e., stupid].

stupidAnd why are health care reform opponents “misinformed?” Well, apparently, it’s because they’re getting all their information from the internet instead of from Ted Turner’s Oracles in Atlanta. CNN is practically apoplectic: “…rumor is picked up as fact and disseminated to millions via blogs and discussion boards…” “…people are just getting information that’s flat wrong.” Heavens to Murgatroyd, don’t people realize that the flacks at CNN are the only Americans bright enough to separate fact from rumor?

Do yourself a favor. Stop reading this column and all the other meaningless shit on the internet. I guarantee you’ll wake up tomorrow morning feeling rested and smarter.

And don’t forget to keep that dial tuned to CNN.


The Supremes are Back

October 3, 2009
supreme_court

The Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has held (District of Columbia v. Heller) that the Second Amendment indeed bestows an individual the right to keep and bear arms. It must have taken thousands of hours of research by law clerks and brilliant ruminations on the part of the nine justices to jump the formidable intellectual chasm between the Constitution’s language, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” and the Court’s pronouncement “that the Second Amendment indeed bestows an individual the right to keep and bear arms.”

This is why these guys make the big bucks. Sure, readers of this blog are of above-average intelligence but could you geniuses have decomposed this legal conundrum without the assistance of law clerks from Harvard and Columbia and constant refills from the top shelf at Citronelle?

supremes

The Supremes

Do you think it’s easy being a Supreme Court justice? Not in this era of equality and political correctness. Back in the old days when the Court was a boys’ club, life was simpler. After their morning prune juice and oatmeal, the dyspeptic nine would gather in the men’s room and discuss contemporary legal issues. Each would sit in his own stall… (Well, there was that one time when a couple of justices… but that’s another story). Anyway, while each guy sat on his porcelain seat of judgment awaiting the highlight of his personal day, the boys would discuss the issues on the Court’s docket and dispense of them with an efficiency that can be witnessed only in individuals who have a ten o’clock tee time.golf The judges would then meet ‘in chambers’ (that is, with their pants pulled up) and tell their clerks to whip out something with a sufficiently high SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) Index so that their decisions would keep brother lawyers employed for another year or so. Clerks also were admonished to cite as many “precedents” as possible on the theory that any legal decision, no matter how stupid, is OK if you can find enough cases where other judges reached the same wrong conclusion.

Nowadays, with women on the court, things are more complicated. Quick decisions in the men’s room are out and justices are forced to meet in a more formal setting, a library, where the female justices insist on consulting endless legal references and the writings of Oprah and Dr. Phil before reaching a decision. The agreed-upon tee time at the Congressional Country Club slips from ‘future’ to ‘present’ to ‘history.’ One inept justice made the mistake of asking another justice, who has a reputation for being a ‘wise Latina,’ for her recipe for huevos rancheros. Our unfortunate would-be chef was curtly informed that one more question like that and he would be wearing a Columbian necktie, one of the great innovations of some ‘wise guy Latinos.’


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.