Monthly Bomb Report

January 31, 2010

Here is a summary of bombing reports for January 2010. These reports were collected from news sources world wide. Sources were searched for bomb reports without regard to any criteria. No attempt was made to confine reports to Muslims or to Middle Eastern locations although one, or both, of these criteria apply most cases.

Because these headlines are contemporaneous with the events, the numbers of persons killed or wounded may not agree with later reports. In a few cases, the bombs did not detonate.

  • Jan  1 – Terror Attack Kills 95 at Pakistan Volleyball Match
  • Jan  3 – Roadside Bombs Kill Ex-Minister, 5 Others in Pakistan
  • Jan  4 – 4 US Service Members, British Soldier Die in Afghan Blasts
  • Jan  4 – 3 Policemen Killed in Two Bombings in Northern Iraq
  • Jan  4 – At Least Six Killed, 17 Injured, in Northern Iraq Attacks
  • Jan  6 – Suicide Bomber Kills 6, Wounds 14 in Russia’s North Caucasus Region
  • Jan  7 – Suicide Bomber Kills Eight, Wounds 24 in Eastern Afghan Town
  • Jan  7 – Bomb Attacks Kill Seven in Iraq
  • Jan  7 – Somalian Army Chief Escapes Bomb Attack
  • Jan  8 – Three Malaysia Churches Firebombed As ‘Allah’ Use Tension Mounts
  • Jan  8 – Karachi Suicide Blast Kills 8
  • Jan  8 – 1 US, 8 Afghan Troops Killed by Roadside Bombs
  • Jan  8 – 7 Killed in Suicide Bomb In Afghanistan
  • Jan  8 – Bomb Attack Wounds Afghan Governor
  • Jan  8 – 8 Killed, 10 Hurt by Homemade Bombs in Iraq
  • Jan  8 – Car Bomb Injures Policeman in Tense Northern Ireland
  • Jan  9 – Attackers Firebomb Four Malaysian Churches
  • Jan  9 – Bomb Goes Off Near Greek Parliament Building
  • Jan  9 – Eight Killed in Series of Bomb Attacks on Police West of Baghdad
  • Jan 10 – Petrol Bomb Thrown At Malaysian Catholic Convent School
  • Jan 10 – British Journalist Killedin Afghanistan by Roadside Bomb
  • Jan 10 – Northern Ireland Mirror Journalist Hurt in Afghan Bomb
  • Jan 10 – Roadside Bomb Kills Three Charity Workers, Wounds Two Others
  • Jan 11 – Baghdad Car Bomb Wounds Five
  • Jan 11 – Ninth Malaysian Church Firebombed in “Allah” Dispute
  • Jan 12 – Iranian Nuclear Scientist Killed Tuesday by Remote-Controlled Bomb
  • Jan 13 – Ohio Man Pleads Not Guilty to Possessing Dozens of Pipe Bombs
  • Jan 13 – At Least 4 Baghdad Suicide Car Bombers Stopped, Arrested by Police
  • Jan 13 – Bomb Wounds 3 Girls in Lebanon
  • Jan 13 – 200,000 In Russian Dagestan Without Gas Supplies After Bomb Explodes
  • Jan 14 – Bomb Explodes in Afghanistan Market, Killing 15, Wounding 12
  • Jan 14 – Two American, Five Afghans, One French Soldier Killed in Afghanistan Bomb Blasts
  • Jan 14 – Afghanistan Suicide Truck Bomb Injures Several
  • Jan 14 – Two US Soldiers Killed in Eastern Afghanistan Explosion
  • Jan 15 – American Soldier Killed in Afghanistan by Crude Bomb
  • Jan 15 – Roadside Afghanistan Bomb Kills Five, Including Four Children
  • Jan 16 – Man Sets Off Bomb near Iranian Provincial Governor’s Office, Fatally Wounding Self, Causing No Other Damage
  • Jan 16 – Kashmir Suicide Bomber Kills Pakistani Soldier, Injures Several Others
  • Jan 16 – Pipe Bomb Found in Backyard of Concord CA Home
  • Jan 17 – Pipe Bomb Detonates In A South San Francisco Parking Lot, No Injuries
  • Jan 18 – Gunmen Kill Five in Baghdad, Leave Bomb for Police
  • Jan 18 – Suicide Car Bomb Explodes Outside Kabul Shopping Centre Killing Several Police, Intelligence Officials
  • Jan 18 – Bomb Detonated Against Israeli Diplomats in Jordan, No Injuries
  • Jan 18 – Bomb Destroys Boys Primary School in Khyber, No Injuries Reported
  • Jan 18 – Four Soldiers, One Civilian, Seven Militants Killed in Kabul Bomb Attack
  • Jan 20 – Peshawar Bomb Blast Injures Politician, Three Others
  • Jan 20 – Mosul Suicide Car Bomber Wounds 30
  • Jan 20 – 20-Year-Old Bethesda MD Man Sentenced to Five Years in Plot to Assassinate President Obama
  • Jan 22 – Federal Agents Arrest Northwest Missouri Man for Making Bombs
  • Jan 22 – Abdul Basit Usman, Filipino Bomb-Making Expert Killed by American Military Drone
  • Jan 23 – Four Afghan Soldiers Killed by Hidden Taliban Bomb
  • Jan 23 – Two American Soldiers Killed by IED in Southern Afghanistan
  • Jan 23 – Seven Afghans Killed Trying to Excavate Old Bomb
  • Jan 23 – Suicide Bomber Kills at Least Four, Including Two Children, in Pakistan
  • Jan 24 – Three U.S. Service Members Killed in Two Bombings in Southern Afghanistan
  • Jan 25 – Over 30 Killed As Bombers Hit Baghdad Hotels
  • Jan 25 – Bomb Kills British Soldier in Afghanistan
  • Jan 26 – Eight Americans Wounded by Taliban Suicide Bomber
  • Jan 26 – 18 Killed in Baghdad Car Bombing
  • Jan 26 – Terrorist Kills Self in Kabul Blast near American Convoy
  • Jan 26 – Lanarkshire (UK) Man Claims Devil Told Him to Bomb House
  • Jan 26 – Bomb Kills Three Children in Pakistan
  • Jan 26 – Bomb Explodes outside US Afghanistan Base, Injuring 6
  • Jan 31 – Bomb Kills 2 Soldiers in Northwest Pakistan
  • Jan 31 – Bomb Blast in Northwest Pakistan Kills 14

Prince of Fools

January 30, 2010

The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.

The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails them. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.

The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

Author unknown

I feel a bit sorry for the “unknown” author of the above quotation. I don’t entirely agree with him but it’s a solid observation that’s been pushed around the e-mail circuit and has no less than 219,000 hits on Google. Apparently a lot of people are passing it off as their own. I’ve seen it posted as a comment on multiple sites and the “authors” of these posts are signing it as if they wrote it themselves.

Shame on you all

That said, I agree that Obama is the Prince of Fools and that his supporters constitute a Confederacy of Fools. But I disagree with the author’s contention that the Republic cannot survive the multitude of fools who put Obama in office. He’s right, we couldn’t if the Confederacy of Fools remained intact; however, the flaw in his argument is that members of the Confederacy of Fools are too ignorant to learn from their mistakes.

Believe me, some of the biggest political fools in the country live in Massachusetts. After all, they kept that drunken coward Ted Kennedy in office for almost half a century. But, while the people of Massachusetts obviously will suffer fools gladly, even they could see through the lies, smoke, mirrors, and corruption of Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.

The people of Massachusetts elected a Republican to the US Senate! I can almost picture them holding their noses while, for the first time in their lives, they voted for a Republican. Scott Brown was not elected because of his decades-old nude centerfold in Cosmo; he wasn’t elected because of his piercing political insights; and, in Massachusetts, you can be sure as hell he wasn’t elected because he was a Republican.

He was elected because even members of the Confederacy of Fools in Massachusetts had learned something from the Obamanation of the past year.

The Big Question being debated by insiders in both parties now is “Is Obama going to be a one-term president?” It’s too early to tell but the in-fighting in both parties for the inside track in the 2012 primaries already is underway. He told ABC’s Diane Sawyer, “I’d rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.”

Apparently, he’s overlooked the fact that he’s already well into the third option: being a mediocre one-term president.


One of Them Is Lying

January 29, 2010

In December, President Obama announced that he would send an additional 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan. In a speech delivered at West Point he said, “…these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011.”

Yesterday, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai said his country’s security forces would require another 15 years of Western support before they will be able to sustain themselves. “With regard to training and equipping the Afghan security forces, five to 10 years will be enough. With regard to sustaining them until Afghanistan is financially able to provide for our forces, the time will be extended to 10 to 15 years.”

So Obama thinks he’s going to bring our troops beginning in July 2011; Karzai says he’s going to need Western troops for at least 5-10 years and Western money for 10 to 15 years.

One of them is lying. Whom do you think it is?


Train Service We Need

January 28, 2010

Yesterday I remarked on Mr. Obama’s proposal to fund some high-speed rail corridors. I suggested that these generally wouldn’t do much to solve the problems of highway congestion. Today, a look at rail service that will reduce congestion on the highways and save lives.

If you want to reduce highway congestion by investing in rail, freight service is where the big payoff comes. How? By getting the goddamn trucks off the highway. A “big-rig” tractor-trailer can carry something like a 40-ton payload. A single rail car can carry 100 tons. Every truck on the road requires at least one driver, sometimes two. A 200-car freight train, carrying the equivalent payload of 500 trucks, can be operated by a crew of two or three.

Trucks are destroying our highways faster than we can repair them. Sometimes you’ll see a truck with a bumper sticker that says something like “This vehicle pays over $8000 a year in highway taxes.” That is not near enough for the damage they do. Our interstate highways would last decades if it weren’t for trucks. As it is, they’re pretty well busted to shit after 5 years of truck traffic. Part of the problem is that weight limits are weakly enforced. Most weigh stations are closed more than they are open, and truckers quickly network information on which weigh stations are operating. So, rarely, they get caught overweight. If they are caught, they pay a fine but, in the long run, the extra revenue from running overweight more than covers the fines. To hell with the highways.

Truck drivers generally are rude. They’ll pull into the left lane to pass another truck if it’s going only 3/10 of a mile an hour slower. Fuck the cars they block. They’re not about to have another truck slow THEM down. As a result, they increase congestion by reducing the speed of traffic.

Trucks accelerate slowly and require more braking distance. In heavy traffic this increases congestion.

Trucks are killers. In two-vehicle accidents involving a truck and a passenger car somewhere between 77% and 98% of the fatalities are occupants of the passenger vehicle. (Which fatality rate you choose depends on whether you get your numbers from the trucking industry or the auto industry). I don’t think truckers want to crash more than anyone else but, if they do, their bodily risks are a lot lower than those of people in cars.

Some truck-related accident data:

  • Over 5000 people are killed annually in crashes involving large trucks, representing 12 percent of all traffic fatalities. An additional 116,000 people are injured in these crashes. (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)).
  • Nearly one-quarter of the occupant deaths in passenger vehicles involved in multi-vehicle collisions are the result of crashes involving large trucks. (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety).
  • Large trucks make up just 4 percent of all registered vehicles and 7 percent of all vehicle miles traveled, but are involved in 11 percent of all crash fatalities. (NHTSA).

Reducing the number of trucks on our highways would save lives, save money on repair costs, and reduce congestion. And reducing the number of trucks isn’t that difficult. The solution is already here. We’re just not using it enough: Put the freight on the railroads instead of on the highways.

Container Well Railroad Cars - Every One Takes Two Trucks off the Highway

The transportation industry (ocean shipping, rail, and trucking) already has solved the problem world wide with intermodal containers. Load the container with freight, put the container on a truck, move it a short distance to the rail head, transfer it, move it to a container port and load it on a ship. Offload onto a rail line at the port of destination, haul the container by rail as close as reasonable to its destination, load it onto a truck and deliver it.

1 Train = 500 Trucks

We’re already doing this in the US, quite successfully. I live near a rail line where 80 or so of these intermodal trains pass every day. That’s the equivalent of 3 or 4 thousand trucks that are NOT on the highway thanks to the railroads.

But we still have trucks driving thousands of miles on the highways instead of putting their loads on the railroads. Why? As always, follow the money. As long as trucks can use our highways without bearing their share of the costs of the highways, long-haul trucks will continue to operate. Answer: raise the taxes on interstate trucking to a point where shippers will find the railroads a better deal.

If it absolutely, positively has to get there overnight, you put it on an airplane and pay a large fortune. If it has to get there in a few days, instead of a week, put it on a long-haul truck and pay a small fortune. If a week is OK, put it on a railroad and ship it cheap.

We all save money.


Obama Goes Trainspotting

January 27, 2010

I love trains.

That’s why I was intrigued when I heard that Obama and Biden plan to announce grants totaling $8 billion to build 13 major high-speed rail corridors around the country. It’s an attempt to show that the president has a plan for getting Americans back to work and, at the same time, a solution for the congestion in some of our major travel corridors. Unfortunately, like the highway repairs undertaken as part of the stimulus package, it is not likely to produce many new jobs nor is it likely to do much for our transportation problems.

The president plans to announce the package Thursday in Florida so it looks like a high-speed line connecting Orlando and Tampa will receive funding (like the country really needs that). California’s proposal for an 800-mile-long rail line from Sacramento to San Diego and a nine-state proposal in the Midwest also are considered strong contenders.

Eight billion dollars is a lot of money but it wouldn’t begin to cover the costs of the systems proposed above. Assuming they can use existing railroad rights of way to build most of these corridors, the $8 billion won’t cover the cost of track and rolling stock. If they have to buy rights of way the costs will be enormous. But what the hell, what’s another $100 billion or so? At the rate we’re going it just means we’ll be broke a few days sooner.

High-speed rail sounds like a great idea for heavily-traveled corridors but it isn’t all that appealing in reality. Except for densely packed spaces like New York and Washington where there is adequate local public transportation, high speed rail does not solve the problem of the “last mile.” That is, if you have to hoof it for a mile or wait 20-30 minutes for a bus at the beginning and end of each trip, the high-speed train saves you no time and very little money. Might as well drive.

(Low-Speed) Passenger Service

We still have some low-speed passenger service available. If there’s a station near you and one near where you’re going, it’s worth considering if time isn’t a factor.

To my mind, train travel it is the most elegant way to get around—comfortable seats; a ground-level view of the passing towns and countryside; you can walk around or go to the bathroom without permission; no security checks (yet). On longer trips you can get passable meals and, if you can afford it, a private room with a bed. Passenger trains are slower than flying and really no faster than driving, but they’re a lot more relaxing than either

All of the long-haul passenger train service in the United States is now under the aegis of Amtrak, officially The National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak’s preferred stock is owned by the U.S. federal government. Its board of directors is appointed by the President.

Amtrak does not earn a profit. It is subsidized by the taxpayers. Research done a few years back showed that the taxpayer subsidies were so high relative to Amtrak ridership and revenues that it would be cheaper for the federal government to shut Amtrak down completely and buy airline tickets for all the people who wanted to travel on Amtrak.

Granted, a few Amtrak routes, like the Boston-Washington corridor, earn a profit but most do not.

The reasons for the failure of passenger rail service in the United States are manifold. Time is probably the biggest one: two days by train, three or four hours by air. Interstate highways make driving as fast, feasible, and cost-effective as train rides. There are a lot of places we want to go where there is no rail or air service so, either way, you wind up driving or renting a car.

But don’t get me wrong. Railroads are extremely important and a good investment. We’re just putting our money in the wrong place.

Tomorrow: Train Service We Do Need


Global Warming a Con Job? No, Say it isn’t So!

January 26, 2010

You may recall that in The Book of Glacial Meltdown I suggested that there were some holes in the International Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) story about the melting of the Himalayan glaciers. It seems that the original story was based on some less-than-diligent science.

The IPCC does not carry out its own original research, but it is the world’s leading authority on “global warming.”  The IPCC bases its assessments mainly on peer reviewed and published scientific literature.

The IPCC is a political organization underwritten entirely by the United Nations. IPCC’s real job is not science but politics.

Ragendra Pachauri. Is that a yarmulke or just a bad comb over?

Want proof?: IPCC is run by a guy named Rajendra Pachauri. Even though he is managing an organization that is trying to engineer fundamental changes in the way 6 billion people live Mr. Pachauri has no formal education in climatology. Although university educated, Mr. Pachauri has spent most of his career as an advocate and consultant, not as a scientist.

On behalf of the IPCC he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize in December 2007, when it was shared with another “expert” on climatology and global warming, Al Gore.

Mr. Pachauri’s job is to extort the world’s people and industries out of massive amounts of money in order to stop global warming. The most polite term an American could apply to Mr. Pachauri would be a ‘lobbyist.’ ‘Shakedown artist’ or just ‘con man’ seem to be more accurate.

When scientists began to question the quality of material being published by IPCC Mr. Pachauri accused his critics of using “voodoo science” and urged the climate research community and international governments to ignore them.

Mr. Pachauri is noted for wearing expensive suits, leading a lavish lifestyle, and living in Golf Links, India (near New Delhi) where the cheapest of houses sells for several million dollars. The sources and amounts of Mr. Pachauri’s income have not been made public.

Mr. Pachauri is a vegetarian who thinks a large part of the global warming problem could be ameliorated if everyone just stopped eating meat.


It’s Great to be in Elyria

January 25, 2010

A person who wants to be President of the United States should meet at least two criteria:

  1. Campaigning: raising campaign money; earning support of party leaders; connecting with and motivating voters.
  2. Leadership: selecting and directing a competent staff; setting a clear agenda for his administration; communicating his vision with the congress and the people.

Barack Obama clearly meets Criterion 1. He was an able campaigner and fund-raiser. He energized and motivated voters, and he won.

As for Criterion 2, he’s been less than successful. The Bailout, Healthcare, Afghanistan, Global Warming—none of these has drawn high marks. Already, if we are to believe the polls and the voters of Massachusetts, the country has pretty well had it with Mr. Obama’s leadership.

So, if a president fails as a leader, what does he do? He goes back to campaigning! And that’s exactly what Mr. Obama has done, starting with an appearance in Elyria, Ohio, a poster child for rust-belt unemployment, decay, and ennui. An abridged version of his January 22 text follows. Everything in bold face is Mr. Obama’s. I’ve taken the liberty of adding a few comments.

It’s great to be here in Elyria. (I wanted to go to Cleveland but Michelle said, “Barry dear. Let’s go back to Elyria. It was such fun!”). It’s always nice to get out of Washington. (Any combat veteran will tell you it’s always nice to get out of a killing zone).

I know these have been difficult and unsettling times for people in Elyria, in Ohio, and across our country. I walked into office a year ago in the middle of a raging economic storm that was wreaking devastation on your town and communities everywhere. (None of this is my fault—the TARP mess, Cash for Clunkers, dicking with health care when what people really need is jobs—we can blame this whole mess on You Know Who).

In my first months in office, we also helped save two of the big three automakers from collapse. Some people weren’t happy about that, either. They felt that if you make a bad decision, you ought to reap the consequences, just like any business would. But if we had let GM and Chrysler simply go under, hundreds of thousands of Americans would have been hurt. (We just had to save the jobs of UAW members who were making $120 an hour running a fork lift).

So, we said, if you’re willing to take the tough and painful steps to make yourselves more competitive, we’re willing to invest in your future. (Because we know that when it comes time to raise money for Hope and Change 2012, the UAW and the execs at GM and Chrysler will remember who their friends are).

We gave aid to states to help them through these tough times. (Believe it or not, this is a smoke and mirrors trick we learned from Richard Nixon: “Revenue Sharing.” We use the taxing power of the federal government to reach into individual states and towns, taking money away from their citizens. Then we turn around and give it back to them, usually with strings attached. People have been buying this “revenue sharing” shit for forty years).

Today, because of the actions we took, the worst of this economic storm has passed. (I’m trying to persuade you that our economists can predict the future better than our weather forecasters.)

I had no illusions when I took on health care. It was always going to be hard. I knew from the beginning that seven Presidents had tried it and seven Presidents had failed. But I also knew that insurance premiums had more than doubled in the past decade, that out-of-pocket expenses had skyrocketed, that millions more people had lost their insurance, and that it would only get worse (mostly because the federal government kept piling more and more requirements on health care providers).

I have to admit, we’ve run into a bit of a buzz saw along the way. (Frankly, it never occurred to us that people would actually wake up and ask “What the hell are you doing?”).

Let me tell you – so long as I have the privilege of serving as your President

  • I’ll never stop fighting for you
  • I’ll never stop fighting to bring jobs back to Elyria
  • I’ll never stop fighting for policies that will help restore home values
  • I’ll never stop fighting to give our kids the best education possible
  • I’ll never stop fighting to give every American a fair shake
  • I’ll never stop fighting to protect you from the kind of deceptive practices we’ve seen from some in the financial sector
  • I’ll never stop fighting to open up government
  • I’ll never stop fighting to cut waste and abuse in Washington
  • I’m going to keep up the fight for real, meaningful health insurance reforms

(In fact, I love fighting so much I think I’m going to join the Marines and do recons in Afghanistan. It sounds like our troops are having such fun over there. Kind of like being in Elyria).

“This is not about me. It’s you. I didn’t take up this issue to boost my poll numbers. You know the way to boost your poll numbers is not do anything. That’s how you do it. You don’t offend anybody. I’d have real high poll numbers. All of Washington would be saying, what a genius (while the rest of America was saying “What an asshole.”).

You know, I said at the beginning how much it means to me to be in Elyria. (I think you’re also smart enough to realize that I would have said the same thing about Devil’s Island or the Black Hole of Calcutta).

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. (See! I finally figured out that Jeremiah Wright saying “God damn America” wasn’t doing my poll numbers any good).


Don’t Feed the Animals

January 24, 2010

I really, really love a politician with balls. And Andre Bauer, Lt. Governor of South Carolina qualifies for the coveted Cajones Trophy. I urge you to  read the entire story, “Don’t Feed the Animals,” in the Boston Herald.

According to Bauer, the “culture of dependency” we have fostered in our welfare system must change.

“The problem is, there are so many folks now who don’t have to do a thing. In government, we continue to reward bad behavior. Anytime we give somebody money, we’re rewarding them. We’re telling them to keep doing what they’re doing. Government’s got to change. Babies having babies, somebody’s got to talk about.

“If you receive goods or services from the government, you owe something back.”

“We’re breeding a culture of dependency. We have generation after generation of babies having babies and no vehicle to get them out of that situation. We’re doing a disservice to the very people we say we’re trying to help.”

“I came from a broken home. I have been in this situation. Do I think poor people ought to be helped? Yes. I’m saying we’ve got to do things to break the cycle.”

“I believe in charity. I believe in helping people. I also believe government, too often in its effort to help people, ends up creating a bigger problem.”

You don’t have to imagine the howls of protest from the liberals regarding Mr. Bauer’s remarks. Just step out in your front yard and you can hear them.


Air America’s Last Flight

January 23, 2010

The politically liberal talk-radio network, Air America, has closed its doors after struggling for six years to find an audience.

Uh, it really doesn't diminish our opinion of you, Al. But thanks for sharing that little bit of information.

Started in 2004 by comedian Al Franken, Air America, in its best days, had only 100 affiliate stations.

Air America never really connected with an audience. There are plenty of liberals in the country so it would seem that someone would have found Air America entertaining, but apparently few people did. Most days, listening to Air America was like listening to Al Gore. No matter what the subject, after five minutes you were digging in your pocket or purse for something with which to slash your wrists.

Al Franken, the centerpiece of Air America, could have been funny. But he was bitter and mean-spirited. On “Saturday Night Live,” he was funny. On Air America he was didactic, strident, and boring. And he was the most talented of the Air America hosts.

Michael Harrison, publisher of Talkers magazine, a trade journal of the talk-radio industry, nailed it:

“The thing that was so maddening about Air America’s original programming was that all you heard was about how bad Rush Limbaugh was and how bad Sean Hannity was. If that’s the ‘liberal message,’ there is no message.”

Franken’s slant was typical of Air America broadcasters—the ad hominem attack. This is a weak form of argument where a person counters the points made by another by attacking him personally rather than responding to his assertions. The title of Franken’s book, Rush Limbaugh is a Big, Fat, Idiot is an example of an ad hominem attack.

Air America was constantly angry about something, sort of like Glenn Beck. They found it difficult to be funny or to have any sense of humor about events.

Limbaugh’s success, on the other hand, stems from his skills as an entertainer and integrator of current events. Yes, he has an agenda and he pounds away at it but, if you can just put away your personal biases and sympathies for an hour or so, he’s fun to listen to, even when he’s wrong. And he’s wrong a lot. On political issues, give him an A or A-, but on science, math, and economics, C+ at best

Robin Bertolucci, program director at KTLK, says that ideology alone was not the reason for Air America’s demise:

“The thing that makes any radio program successful is the entertainment value and the information value,” she said. “What makes a compelling talk-show host is not limited to political ideology.” Citing Limbaugh as an example, Bertolucci said, “He’s a wildly talented and entertaining broadcaster. If he was a communist, I think the show would be successful too— in a very different way.”


When Fertilizer is Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Fertilizer

January 22, 2010

I suspect that Mr. Obama is determined to follow in the tradition of American presidents and leave some sort of legacy. Health care is going down the tubes, immigration reform is a guaranteed loser for any Democrat, so now he’s going to try his hand at war making—you know, go macho like Lyndon Johnson and the Bush’s.

Mr. Obama lacks the brains, balls, and knowledge to engage in this high-stakes game. But he’ll do it anyway because in the entire history of this country no president ever has died in combat though many have sent tens of thousands of Americans to early and unnecessary deaths.

Here’s today’s story:

The United States will maintain a civilian presence in Afghanistan and Pakistan for a long time, even after American combat troops leave the region, a State Department report said on Thursday.

“While our combat mission in Afghanistan is not open-ended, we will remain politically, diplomatically and economically engaged in Afghanistan and Pakistan for the long-term to protect our enduring interests in the region,” the report said.

Susan Cornwell
Reuters

Let’s ignore the references to Pakistan for today and concentrate on the Obama administration’s intent to “maintain a civilian presence in Afghanistan.” This so idiotic that I feel compelled to say the same thing about Obama that I said a few days ago about Sarah Palin: He’s apparently written a book or two but I don’t think he’s actually read any.

According to Obama we’re in Afghanistan for two reasons:

  1. To defeat the Taliban and support the ‘legitimate,’ albeit corrupt and incompetent, government of Hamid Karzai.
  2. To deny al Qaeda a safe haven.

Let’s dispense with al Qaeda first. Al Qaeda does not need a safe haven in Afghanistan. They already have bases in Yemen and Somalia and there are hundreds of countries where they can set up shop whenever they like. We know they had a going operation here in the US prior to 9/11. There’s no reason to believe they aren’t operating here now. Twenty bucks says there’s an al Qaeda office in Detroit.  I cannot understand why “denying al Qaeda a base of operations” is a plausible excuse for the presence of American troops in Afghanistan.

Now to Obama’s second point, ‘defeating the Taliban and making Afghanistan “safe for democracy.”’ This is the most naïve scheme imaginable.

Obama is sending more troops to Afghanistan. His plan is magically to exterminate the Taliban in 18 months and bring our boys and girls home.

We’ve had troops in Afghanistan for 8 years and have not succeeded. The Taliban are still there and still functioning and they will be in 18 months  when Field Marshal Obama begins an ordered withdrawal of his forces.

Hamid Karzai - Woud You Buy a Used Car from this Man?

In the Taliban’s place we installed a corrupt and incompetent government that does not have the allegiance or confidence of the people. Within months after the last American combat forces are gone, the present Kabul government will collapse, absconding to the Caribbean with millions of dollars they’ve skimmed off the largess of America.

The Taliban know this and realize they only need lay low until the Yankee Devils are gone.

Over the next 18 months, around 800 young Americans will come home in aluminum boxes. Another 5000 or so will be permanently mutilated. This figure is based on current casualty rates in Afghanistan. I’m hoping I’m way high here—that the Taliban will realize that killing and maiming Americans isn’t the smart thing to do right now. Just be patient.

The Afghans know that the Americans can’t stay forever and that, when the Yanks are gone, the Taliban will be back in charge within months. Ergo, smile at the Americans but don’t piss off the Taliban.

The Taliban actually have learned some important lessons from mistakes they made in the past. They (unlike Obama and Palin) have been reading on guerilla warfare and revolution—Che Guevara, Mao Tse Tung, and Nguyen Ai Quoc (Ho Chi Minh). The Taliban are actually being nice to the locals.

They control Helmand province (that’s in the south if you don’t have your map handy, Mr. Obama). They set up a shadow government in Helmand and have even installed ombudsmen who regularly talk to the natives and ask ‘how are our local Taliban representatives treating you? Are you being treated fairly? Are they helping you solve your problems? Are they threatening you?’ Hell, the Kabul government doesn’t do this.

Karzai’s latest stroke of genius is to ban the possession of ammonium nitrate, an important and inexpensive fertilizer. True, ammonium nitrate also can be used to make explosives. But the Afghans, who are largely agrarian, can no longer possess decent fertilizer, an important element in crop-growing. But not to worry. The Taliban will be able to get the farmers all the ammonium nitrate they need. The Taliban already have better explosives.

Fortunately, opium and marijuana seem to do well without ammonium nitrate. A question for Messrs Karzai and Obama: Now that it’s a felony to possess ammonium nitrate, will Afghan farmers grow more or less dope?

Barack Obama - Would You Buy a Used Car from this Man?

Obama says he’s going to start pulling American troops out in the summer of 2011 and replace them with—wait for it—civilians!!

We have 1000 or so civilians in Afghanistan right now but that number is supposed to increase significantly as the troops begin their departure. The civilians are reasonably safe so long as we have 100,000 troops watching over them but what do you think will be their fate when the troops leave? Rape, torture, kidnapping, ransom, extortion, murder.

Oh, the legitimate government of Afghanistan is going to protect the Americans, but only if they confine themselves to bunkers in Kabul where they will be largely ineffective. And even this will last only until the Taliban take over again.

Do the right thing Barry—get out now. Walk away from Karzai and his den of thieves. Leave behind enough ammonium nitrate so the locals can grow some decent corn.