Hey Everybody, Let’s Invade Libya!

March 4, 2011

President Obama announced he has ordered plans drawn up giving the US military “full capacity to act, potentially rapidly,” in Libya. Apparently the idea is to divert our attention from trillion-dollar deficits, 9% unemployment, and the new season of American Idol.

Libyan Dictator Colonel Muammar Ghadaffi, (Quadafi, Khadaffy, Gadaffi). Motto, "I don't care how you spell my name as long as you mention it." Colonel? This guy's been in charge for forty years and he still hasn't been promoted to General?

Or perhaps he’s hoping that we’ll pay less attention to the fifty American soldiers returning from Afghanistan every month in aluminum boxes.

It’s a shame that Libyans are dying in the streets of Tripoli and Benghazi. But the Arab world has made it plenty clear that, when they’re busy killing each other, they don’t want Americans intervening and spoiling the fun. We should honor their wishes.

The one real “hope” when Obama was elected was that he might have the balls to get us out of Afghanistan and Iraq. (According to a recent Gallup poll, 76% of Americans think we should bug out of Afghanistan most ricky tick). No such luck. Obama upped the ante, sending in more troops and money. We are now losing 10 soldiers and $2 billion a week in Afghanistan. The only thing we’ve accomplished is to stabilize the price of heroin.

Now Obama is toying with the idea of yet another foreign adventure. Apparently he’s tiring of “George Bush’s wars” and would like one of his very own.


Way to Go, Guys!

February 4, 2011

The big story in last fall’s election was the Republican resurgence in Congress. The red states took over the House and cut the Democrats’ margin in the Senate.

Why the Republican success? Well, they promised to reduce spending and bring an end to our projected multi-trillion dollar deficits. Now, the Republicans have spoken. If their budget plan is adopted, federal spending will be reduced by $82 billion in 2011. In any other arena $82 billion might mean something but, on the scale of federal budgets, it is truly chump change. If all of the Republican ‘cuts’ are enacted the federal budget will be reduced by a whopping 2%. Instead of being $1,482,000,000,000 the 2011 deficit will be only $1,400,000,000,000. Wow. Way to go guys. At this rate we can expect the federal budget to be balanced by, uh, never.

__________________________________________________________

Speaking of red states and blue states—why do you suppose the Republican states are red and the Democrat states are blue? Logically, the Democrat states should be red because red is the color usually associated with the Left. Blue, on the other hand is a cold, unwelcoming color—much more appropriate for the classic characterization of Republicans.

The answer, of course, is that the extreme Left, the communists, expropriated the color red over a century ago. It would be unfair to associate modern-day Democrats with folks like Trotsky, Lenin, and Che Guevara. After all, those guys carried guns.

What concerns me is that the choice of red and blue for our two parties really precludes a third-party movement from ever getting off the ground. Why? Logically, this would be the ‘white’ party and that would never do.

We should just mix red and blue together and paint the country purple.


A Nation of Shoe Clerks, Baristas, and Wal-Mart Greeters

January 14, 2011

There are 14.5 million people on the unemployment rolls. Six and one-half million of these have been jobless for more than six months. The unemployment rate has been above 9% for almost two years, longer than at any time since the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

Initial jobless claims have averaged over 400,000 per week for several years. If the unemployment rate remains more less or steady at 9-10% we can assume that, while 400,000 people filed initial jobless claims, 400,000 other people must have found work. That might be good news because it appears that, while unemployment isn’t getting any better, perhaps it’s not getting any worse.

But it is. Consider these figures from the US Department of Labor (DOL). (Hey, if you can’t trust the government, who can you trust?)

Unemployed Long-tenured Displaced Workers According to DOL, a long-tenured worker is someone who had three or more years of tenure on a job before becoming unemployed. So, a long-tenured displaced worker is someone who had a career, or at least a steady job. This is not an occasional worker, someone who’s in and out of the labor force depending on the weather or hunting season. This is probably a family man, or woman, who is a sole or major provider. The bad news, again according to the DOL, is that 36% of long-tenured workers who lost their jobs over the past three years are still unemployed.

It gets worse. Only 49% of these workers found new jobs and 55% of them are earning less than they did in their previous jobs. Thirty-six per cent of those who found jobs are working for less than 80% of what they earned at their old jobs. The Wall Street Journal cites these unfortunates as indicative of the trend:

  • A former auto worker whose new job (found after a five-month search) pays 20% less
  • A former manufacturing manager who took a 50% pay cut to work as a night janitor
  • A former money manager who used to earn $150,000 a year is now a Starbuck’s barista making less than $20k

The United States is becoming more like a third world country: a small percentage of rich citizens catered to by low-wage Starbuck’s baristas, shoe clerks, and ‘sales associates’ selling them foreign goods (which, ominously, are getting better every year).

Perhaps we can dig our way out of this mess but it won’t be easy and it won’t come through the extension of unemployment benefits and a health-care program we can’t afford. Our economy needs some fundamental changes and they won’t come from Washington or, I should say, they won’t come until Washington gets out of the way.

Can anyone explain to me why the stock market is at its highest level in two years?


The Pope Is in the House

September 18, 2010

At a cost of $130 million to British taxpayers the pope is in the UK for, well, ‘good will.’ If he’s trying to win back the people who separated from the Church Universal back in the days of Henry VIII, he’s a little late. Britons are overwhelmingly non-believers; 71% answered ‘No’ to a Gallup poll that asked, “Does religion occupy an important place in your life?” Actually the pope is in town to mend fences with the Anglican Church. He sees an opportunity to recruit Anglicans who are disenchanted with the Church of England’s willingness to ordain gays and women. The One True Church would never tolerate women running around the sacristy like they owned the place. Like the Muslims, the Church sees only a subordinate role for anyone lacking an appropriate level of testosterone. During his poaching expedition to the UK the pope had something to say about the failure of secular democracy in the modern world:

“By appeal to what authority can moral dilemmas be resolved? If moral principles underpinning the democratic process are themselves determined by nothing more solid than social consensus, then the fragility of the process becomes all too evident – herein lies the real challenge for democracy.”

"Sieg heil. Piss on you. Er, peace be upon you."

Underlying this careful phrasing is His Holiness’ contention that the only reliable source of moral guidance for this world is The Church. This, of course, is the same church that was still executing heretics less than two centuries ago and, in the modern era, has released a battalion of pedophiles upon young believers. The pope fails to recognize that the Judeo-Christian religion for which he is the front man has two millenia of tradition at least as barbarous as that of Islam. Animal and human sacrifice, animism, rape, murder, slavery, and misogyny permeate the Old and New Testaments. If the Bible sanctions these outrages, why doesn’t the Church espouse them today? Only because their Good Book, a confusing, contradictory document written primarily by ignorant shepherds, has been overtaken by Western philosophy. That’s right folks, it is secular, godless thought that has corrected the worst abuses of Judeo-Christian theology. Read the Bible, Your Holiness. What does Deuteronomy say about our duty to kill our children if they stray from the path of righteousness? Oh, that’s the Old Testament, you say? What about Paul’s exhortations to women and slaves to be subordinate to their masters? Christianity, as practiced today, is marginally palatable only because it has been tempered by the influence of secular thinkers from the Greeks to Eric Hoffer. It is difficult to envision the living hell in which we would exist were the Good Book our standard for moral conduct.


Let’s Face It, They’re All Nuts

September 12, 2010

For the past few months, controversy has raged over the plan of Muslim groups to build a mega-mosque within blocks of the former site of the World Trade Center. The Ground Zero Mosque, while permitted under the religious freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution, represents a poke in the eye with a sharp stick to Americans everywhere. It has been likened to building a memorial to Hitler in the vicinity of Auschwitz, permitted perhaps by Polish law (though unlikely) but in poor taste and gross disregard for the sentiments of rational people everywhere.

Christians, however, would be guilty of hypocrisy if they were to condemn Muslims for their irrational fundamentalism and insensitivity to the feelings of non-believers. Consider, for example, Bill Keller, a Christian evangelist who says “When [Muslims] decided to build a mosque and decided to preach what I consider a 1,400-year-old lie from Hell, I decided that somebody should be down there preaching the truth of God’s word.” Keller wants to build a Ground Zero Christian Center to “counter the lies of Islam. All these people will die and burn in hell,” says Keller. “Islam is not and has never been a religion of peace.”

Apparently, neither is Christianity. Consider Justin Carl Moose, 26, of Concord NC, who calls himself the “Christian counterpart of Osama bin Laden.” Moose has declared jihad against American infidels who perform abortions. Moose was busted by the FBI, which claims he collaborated to plan the bombing of an abortion clinic in North Carolina.

For once, the feds probably are right. Moose has not been shy about sharing his plans via his Facebook page: “Whatever you may think about me, you’re probably right. Extremist, Radical, Fundamentalist…? Yep! Terrorist…? Well, I prefer the term ’freedom Fighter.’ There few problems in life that can’t be solved with the proper application of high explosives :) “  (yes, he actually posted a smiley-face emoticon). “If a mosque is built on ground zero, it will be removed. Oklahoma City style. Tim [McVeigh is] not the only man out there that knows how to do it. I have learned a lot from the muslim terrorists and have no problem using their tactics.”

Arguably, Christians and Muslims owe allegiance to the same god. He needs to take them all to the celestial woodshed and whack them soundly. That He has not done so is evidence of:

  • stupidity
  • callous disregard for His flock
  • impotence
  • non-existence

Take your pick.


My Father Served in World War II

August 6, 2010

“You know, when I go down to south Texas and find out that veterans are having to drive two, three hours just to get into a V.A. facility because there’s no V.A. hospital down along the border areas, when you go down to Puerto Rico and find out that veterans there are not getting the same services as veterans in the 50 states, then you know we’re betraying what I think is a solemn pact that we make with our veterans. My father served in World War II. And when he came home, he got the services that he needed. And that includes, by the way, post-traumatic stress disorder. So many young people are coming back with mental health issues and because we don’t deal with them as effectively and as swiftly as we should, that’s why we’ve got homeless populations among veterans that are astronomically higher than the regular population and that’s something that we cannot accept and I’m going to need your help to make sure that we fight to make sure every veteran gets the services that they need.”

Candidate Obama
June 28, 2008

When I first saw the video I was suspicious that someone had doctored the voice track and put these words in Obama’s mouth.

One of the famed Buffalo Soldiers of the Civil War, the president's brother, Osama Obama, served at Gettysburg under Maj. Gen. George G. Meade

Barack Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was born in Kenya in 1936. He turned 9 a few months before the Japanese surrendered. Obama’s stepfather, Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo was born in Indonesia in 1935; he was 10 when the war ended. It appeared that, like so much anti-Obama propaganda, it was a fake. So, I did a little research and found the CNN transcript of Obama’s statement. It’s real and it is an outrage that Obama should be allowed to get away with shit like this. Dan Quayle misspells “potatoe” and the press goes wild. Obama perpetrates a bald-faced lie and nobody says anything. Note also that he speaks about “post-traumatic stress disorder” which was not even a diagnosis until sometime in the 70′s. The closest analog to PTSD in WWII was “shell shock.” The VA began treating PTSD sometime during, or just after, the Viet Nam war.

Our press was quick to jump on the verbal gaffes of George Bush and the pratfalls of Gerald Ford. Yet they let this fabrication stand without question.

If you’re skeptical, you can read the transcript at CNN.


Free Basketball Tickets

August 2, 2010

As you probably know, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed a bill authorizing police in Arizona to verify the immigration status of persons who are detained for misdemeanors, felonies, or just simple suspicion on the part of the officer that the person is in the country illegally. This law is Arizona’s rejoinder to a federal government that, Brewer claims, is not doing its job. Illegal immigrants, according to the Arizona’s legislature and governor, are costing the state hundreds of millions in welfare, medical, education, and incarceration expenses.

Enforcement of Arizona’s law has been restrained temporarily by a federal judge. It probably will be months, if not years, before this issue is ‘resolved’ in the courts. I put ‘resolved’ in quotes because the courts likely will rule on political considerations rather than strict construction of the Constitution. As I noted several days ago (The Feds Won’t Enforce Their Laws and Neither Can You), the Constitution makes it clear that Arizona does have the power to make and enforce immigration laws if it so chooses, particularly when the federal government abrogates its responsibilities.

Meanwhile, a rather interesting analogy is circulating on the web and in e-mails. I cannot verify whether Brewer or Robert Sarver, owner of the Phoenix Suns, actually said what is attributed to them below, but it really doesn’t matter. The analogy, whether composed by Brewer or some anonymous blogger, is valid:

The owner of the Phoenix Suns basketball team, Robert Sarver, opposes AZ’s new immigration laws. Arizona’s Governor, Jan Brewer, released the following statement in response to Sarver’s criticism of the new law:

“What if the owners of the Suns discovered that hordes of people were sneaking into games without paying?

What if they had a good idea who the gate-crashers are, but the ushers and security personnel were not allowed to ask these folks to produce their ticket stubs, thus non-paying attendees couldn’t be ejected.

Furthermore, what if Suns’ ownership was expected to provide those who sneaked in with complimentary eats and drink?

And what if, on those days when a gate-crasher became ill or injured, the Suns had to provide free medical care and shelter?”

quotation attributed to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer


News McNuggets

July 30, 2010

“Even less useful information than you get from the Weather Channel!”

______________________

The French government decided Wednesday to impose a $185 fine on women who wear a full-face Islamic veil in public…

Washington Post

Not so fast, Pierre. Sometimes the wearing of a veil is a public service.

______________________

District of Columbia High school students have been complaining to District officials that the free condoms the city has been offering are too small.  So D.C. officials have decided to stock up on Trojan Condoms’ super-size Magnum variety.

Washington Post

Sorry white boy, but it’s true.

______________________

In Mexico, illegal immigrants receive terrible treatment from corrupt Mexican authorities.

USA Today

Maybe we can learn something from the Mexicans.

______________________

FDA officials visited 91 kitchens operated by airline caterers and found unhealthy preparation methods in 27 kitchens. The three major airline caterers, LSG Sky Chefs, Gate Gourmet, and Flying Food Group deliver food to Delta, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

Money Times

Obviously a Democrat conspiracy against those rich Republican bastards in first class.

______________________

The Somali Islamist group al-Shabab has said it is “very happy” about the twin blasts which hit the Ugandan capital Kampala on Sunday, killing 74 people.

BBC

“I love the smell of napalm in the morning.”

______________________

Many Doctors Don’t Report Incompetent Colleagues. Survey Shows One-Third Don’t Blow Whistle on Peers Who Are Impaired or Incompetent.

Web MD

An old joke comes to life. Q: What do you call a guy who graduated at the bottom of his class in medical school? A: Doctor.  (Q: What do you call a guy who graduated at the bottom of his class in law school? A:Your Honor).

______________________

They blow each other up by mistake. They bungle even simple schemes. They get intimate with cows and donkeys. Our terrorist enemies trade on the perception that they’re well trained and religiously devout, but in fact, many are fools and perverts who are far less organized and sophisticated than we imagine.

The Atlantic

It’s true. If it weren’t for the fact that once in a while these assholes succeed, they’d be a laugh riot. The overhead Predator drone shots of these misogynists fucking sheep are priceless.

______________________

A Taliban commander and his assistant died when a bomb they were assembling blew up, Pakistani officials say. The militant leader, Irshad Khan, is suspected of several attacks on Pakistani soldiers in the region. Several of Khan’s family were wounded when the device exploded at his home in the Bajaur tribal region of north-western Pakistan, officials said.

BBC

That’s what happens when you let little Achmed play with the mercury fulminate.

______________________

A gay priest sex scandal has rocked the Catholic Church in Italy after a weekly news magazine released details of a shock investigation it had carried out. Using hidden cameras, a journalist from Panorama magazine filmed three priests as they attended gay nightspots and had casual sex.

London Daily Mail

Now that young boys are off limits, what did you expect the priests to do? (Q: Why don’t priests fuck sheep? A: They don’t want to be accused of being closet Muslims).


The Feds Won’t Enforce Their Laws and Neither Can You

July 29, 2010

“Against a backdrop of rampant illegal immigration, escalating drug and human trafficking crimes, and serious public safety concerns, the Arizona Legislature enacted a set of statutes and statutory amendments in the form of Senate Bill 1070…The Court by no means disregards Arizona’s interests in controlling illegal immigration and addressing the concurrent problems with crime including the trafficking of humans, drugs, guns, and money. Even though Arizona’s interests may be consistent with those of the federal government, it is not in the public interest for Arizona to enforce preempted laws… The Court therefore finds that preserving the status quo through a preliminary injunction is less harmful than allowing state laws that are likely preempted by federal law to be enforced.”

Judge Susan Bolton
United States District Court for the District of Arizona

Praise the Lord. Apparently even God is on the side of the illegals.

The Court has spoken and, as expected, cites precedent (i.e., the errors of previous judges) and the supremacy of federal law over state law. So, once again, the will of the people is pre-empted by claims that federal law trumps state law.

According to Ms. Bolton, most of the Arizona law cannot be enforced, even though the Arizona law says about the same thing as the federal law. Underlying her reasoning is the understanding that the federal government already has laws in place allowing federal officers to determine the citizenship of suspected illegal aliens and to take appropriate action when they determine that immigration laws have been broken. According to Ms. Bolton, only the feds have the right to make and enforce immigration laws.

There’s only one problem: the federal government consistently has demonstrated a reluctance fully to enforce federal immigration laws. Once illegals manage to enter the country they are unlikely to be subject to federal enforcement of immigration laws unless they are arrested for violating some other federal law. About the only exception is when someone is caught up in a raid on an employer suspected of hiring illegals.

The State of Arizona is powerless to enforce federal immigration laws. “Against a backdrop of rampant illegal immigration, escalating drug and human trafficking crimes, and serious public safety concerns” (Judge Bolton’s words) Arizona’s only recourse is to enact and enforce its own immigration laws. This, the State of Arizona has every right to do. First, because the feds are not doing their jobs and, second, because the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution protect the rights of the states and their citizens to make and enforce law:

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Amendment IX

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Amendment X

Ms. Bolton and her clerks spent a lot of time culling the law libraries for precedents when all they need have done is read the Constitution. This is yet another example of the Courts ignoring the Constitution and reaching for any excuse to ratify their pre-conceived notions of what America ought to be.

By Ms. Bolton’s reasoning, the federal government can prevent the states from passing almost any law by simply passing a federal law and then not enforcing it.

You can read the full text of Ms. Bolton’s decision at http://www.azcentral.com/ic/pdf/0729sb1070-bolton-ruling.pdf


The Operative Word Is “Citizen”

July 28, 2010

You’ve probably heard of LULAC, the League of United Latin American Citizens. The most important word in LULAC’s name should be “citizen,” but the name of this organization contradicts LULAC’s mission statement: “The Mission of the League of United Latin American Citizens is to advance the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, housing, health and civil rights of the Hispanic population of the United States.” No mention of citizens here.

LULAC is another of the growing number of organizations that rapidly are dividing this nation into racial/ethnic constituencies. Our house is being divided against itself by organizations that emphasize national origin, race, language, religion, etc. vs. the notion of being Americans.

Virtually everyone in this country is represented by one or more of these organizations except, of course, white males under 55. Their only recourse is the Elks Club or the American Nazi Party.

LULAC’s hypocrisy? They claim to represent Latin American citizens but, in recent years, the bulk of their agenda has been the representation of non-citizens, more specifically illegal aliens. LULAC’s top agenda item is “immigration reform.” Immigration Reform is a code for Amnesty, nothing less. There is not a serious immigration reform proposal out there that does not include amnesty as its central feature (see “Obama Wants Amnesty for 11 Million Illegal Immigrants“). Recently, I made the case that this country cannot afford amnesty for illegal aliens. (see “Tax Amnesty for Illegal Aliens?”). The economic cost to the citizens of this country will break the backs of those whose life savings have not been destroyed already by the profligacy of Wall Street, the congress, and the Bush and Obama administrations.

LULAC National President Rosa Rosales says LULAC will “aggressively target anyone in Congress who isn’t supporting reform efforts” according to the Associated Press. Rosales made the statement at the organization’s July 12-17 national convention in Albuquerque NM. “Rosales pounded her fist on a podium and urged delegates to organize voter registration drives. She says if elected officials don’t support LULAC’s effort, “they’re going to be shaking in their boots” because she says comprehensive immigration reform is coming.” Sounds like a threat to me, and one we should take seriously.

Pandering to the LULAC crowd, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson drew applause when he told the crowd that New Mexico law allows undocumented immigrants to obtain drivers licenses. And he’s proud of this? Richardson, by the way touts himself as the nation’s only Hispanic governor (his mom’s side). That distinction is as dubious as being Baltimore’s only white janitor.

Richardson went on to say “The future of our Latino kids is going to determine where this country goes.” Folks in New Mexico tell me if this is true we’re in deep shit already. New Mexico’s “Latinos” lead the state in crime rates, teen pregnancies, and high school dropout rates.

The problem of illegal aliens in the United States is fast coming to a head. LULAC, the congress, and the president all seem to see the same benefit coming out of amnesty for illegals: votes. To hell with what’s good for the country or what it means to be an American. Just get yourself re-elected no matter what it costs the losers.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.